Let’s say this specific example is more of a typo, and likely be be corrected when the next form is posted. To be honest, the Ontario.ca site is one of the better sites for meeting WCAG 2.0 AA (especially considering the size and volume of tables/charts). As we will discuss below, this isn’t necessarily a complete fail or reflection of the bigger site. That’s right, the “steps to open and complete form” list on the page, isn’t a proper list and doesn’t have proper list items. Case and point: The Ontario Government web page where you download the 2020 Compliance Report doesn’t pass an accessibility checker. And at what point do you say a website isn’t compliant? If 2 web pages aren’t compliant out of 500? 20 pages? What if the website is compliant but not the related documents? Is attempting compliance the same as being compliant? (answers: Unknow, maybe, maybe, not compliant, no/maybe)Ģ020 Accessibility Compliance Report Question #9: Other than the requirements cited in the above questions, is your organization complying with all other applicable requirements in effect under the Information and Communications Standards? Companies are likely attempting to be truthful, but they just aren’t aware of the non-compliance. However, many organizations are most likely submitting their compliance reports stating their content is sufficient. Almost all sites I visit have an abundance of errors - although some are more obscure than others. So how are we doing? Are most websites and public documents WCAG 2.0 AA compliant? In short, it doesn’t look very good. This makes sense as the intent is long term accessibility, not fines. However, the government isn’t driven by potential revenue (they can just raise taxes) so expect much smaller fines or even just some warnings and proof of a strategy to fix issues over the next few years. Up to $50,000 for an individual, or $100,000 for a Corporation… per day! Oh, and potential fines up to $50,000 per day to directors or officers of a corporation. There is also some incentive, oops, I mean possible penalties in the form of fines. The approach for accessible web content seems simple enough: verify your public web content (web pages and related public documents) meet WCAG 2.0 AA and file a report every few years to let the government know you are compliant. Web content published before Jan 1, 2012.WCAG Success criteria 1.2.5 (audio descriptions).WCAG Success criteria 1.2.4 (live captions). Designated public sector organizations, including municipalities and other identified organizations must file by Decem(and every two years). On top of that, companies are required to submit a compliance report to the Government on J(extended deadline). With the JanuAODA compliance date now behind us, businesses and non-profits in Ontario with 50 or more employees had make their public web content accessible based on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 AA (with a few exceptions). What is AODA and public content compliance Sounds great, no arguments here.Īlthough how are organizations in Ontario doing 16 years later with new compliance rules in effect? And what does AODA/WCAG really mean when it comes to accessibility? Let’s take a quick look into the world of AODA and content accessibility. This shouldn’t be a shock as the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) has been around since 2005 and is intended to “reduce and remove barriers for people with disabilities so that Ontario can become more accessible and inclusive for everyone”. Public web content in Ontario must meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 AA as of January 1, 2021.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |